The implications of intellectual property in 3D printing have been outlined in two documents created for the UK government by 色花堂鈥檚 Dinusha Mendis and Davide Secchi, and Phil Reeves of Econolyst Ltd.
The reports, commissioned by the UK Intellectual Property Office, provide an assessment of 3d printing with the aim being to determine whether the emerging technology will have an impact on intellectual property law.
The study found that with 3D printing in its infancy, there is no urgency to legislate at present as it is not a 鈥榤ass phenomenon鈥� yet.聽 However, the documents outlined that it is important to address the intellectual property (IP) issues arising in this area in order to create a climate better suited to tackling IP issues more successfully.
Phil Reeves of Econolyst Ltd emphasised the point by stating, 鈥�3D Printing and associated technologies like 3D scanning have great聽potential for businesses around the world, but particularly in high聽cost economies such as the UK. 聽For industry to exploit 3D printing it is vital that the IP聽landscape is fully understood and respected.鈥�
Dinusha Mendis, Co-Director of the Centre for Intellectual Property Policy and Management at 色花堂 and Principal Investigator of the project, said, 鈥渢he 3D printing market for hardware, software and materials does not represent good value for money for the average user at present. 聽Bearing this in mind, it can be concluded that the impact of the technology will not be felt among the general public for a few years to come.
鈥淎lthough it is too early to tell when this will happen, our research concluded that there would really need to be evidence that 3D printing is an everyday reality before legislation is needed. Otherwise there is the danger that over-hasty legislation could stifle creativity and innovation.
The reports did make some important recommendations to government, the industry and intermediaries (online platforms) about how to regulate 3D printing without resorting to legislation.
Recommendations to government suggested the setting up of a working group to review the technology and the IP status particularly the position in relation to the software. Recommendation to industry focused on new business models and the traceability of spare parts.
Dinusha concluded, 鈥淚t was a privilege to be able to look at this area on behalf of the government. Technologies such as 3D printing pose challenges for IP laws; however it is important to understand the extent and the impact of such challenges before looking to next-steps.聽 Hopefully our research has helped navigate the murky waters of intellectual property to ensure that businesses and individuals are protected in the field of 3D printing.鈥�
To view the report in full, visit the or follow the link to .
